This section sets out some of our ideas and thinking about London and cities in general, in a series of short pieces by Open House Director, Victoria Thornton, and The Rt Hon Nick Raynsford MP and Edwin Heathcote, members of our board of trustees. This page will be regularly updated with new essays.
Victoria Thornton
Hon FRIBA
Founding Director, Open House
The way we plan, design and build our cities can transform our
lives for the better in many ways: good architecture can capture our
imagination, change the way we relate to our neighbours and fellow Londoners,
create new employment and revitalise neglected areas, and improve our
health and well-being. The impact of good design is a more attractive
environment, stronger communities with a sense of ownership and pride
in their local area, and new financial investment. Well-designed buildings
and public spaces are, therefore, vital in creating and sustaining a
vibrant city, from Westminster to Waltham Forest, from Camden to
Croydon, and from Havering to Hillingdon.
Contemporary architecture that is aspirational, innovative and visionary
can help to create a society with the same characteristics. However,
architecture is not a subject taught in the formal education system.
From school to later life, we often have no formal way of learning how
to express our ideas, needs and aspirations for the quality of the buildings
and public spaces in which we live, work, play and learn. Open House
believes everyone should have the opportunity to articulate their views
and concerns by having the right tools and language.
The Rt Hon Nick Raynsford MP
Open House Trustee and Chair of Supporters at Large
Cities have continuously evolved through time, but their success has
always been dependent on them providing a safe and attractive environment
in which people can live, work and relax. In the increasingly competitive
global context of the 21st century, the prosperity of each city will
depend on its ability to satisfy these requirements.
London starts with many advantages, boasting 2000 years of history, a
reputation as a home of world-class contemporary design, and an almost
unparallelled economic and cultural infrastructure. As well as all these
qualities, London’s unique character reflects its astonishingly varied
texture of diverse neighbourhoods linked together by a complex web of
streets, rivers and transport networks. This rich urban geography is
not static, but is changing all the time as the transformation of Canary
Wharf, the Greenwich Peninsula and now the Olympic Park demonstrates
so clearly.
The quality of our urban design is therefore vital to our city’s future,
and now more than ever we need to understand, value and advocate
the highest design standards in our built environment. Open House has
performed an exceptional service over the past 17 years in raising the
profile of London’s buildings and public spaces, and raising awareness
of their value. In Open House’s 18th year I am happy to commend its vitally
important work and to urge all those with responsibility for London’s
built environment to heed its message.
Edwin Heathcote
Architectural Critic
Financial Times,
Open House Trustee
The city, the most complex and extraordinary result of civilisation,
exists at different levels: as an idea – the skyline, the monuments,
the museums; as a network – the intricate weave of streets and squares,
of transport and communications; and as a backdrop – the frame against
which we play out the dramas and rituals of our everyday lives. Each
incarnation demands a distinct approach yet one that communicates and
negotiates with each of the others.
Recent architectural debate has been dominated by the ‘icon’ but no city
can be made of icons. In fact icons are anathema to the everyday: the
city is made of the ordinary. That sounds dull but it isn’t, because
London’s deep layers of history and memory, combined with and overlaid
by the contemporary, create a subtly shifting palimpsest of endless invention
and adaptation. Pieces of the city are reused and reinvented, they fall
in and out of favour and fashion, and each era leaves its traces on a
compelling background.
Each section of the city has embedded within it a story and is itself
a part of the larger urban narrative. Those who have stewardship of the
city must become conscious of that story and work with the fabric, not
against it, to elaborate the story and make it clearer while adding a
layer that brings new life. Every intervention has the potential to be
a complex, endlessly fascinating template for a new chapter, but equally
could become a dead end, an appendix.
London, possibly more than any other city, has proved able to reinvent
itself whilst building on its own mythology and an awareness of the beauty
in the subtlest patterns of its fabric rather than in the quest for the
theatrical and the formal. Its narrative will develop best when those
who are responsible for shaping it dig down into the layers of change,
to discern what it is about the areas and buildings that have been and
are able to accommodate industry and commerce but also luxury and consumption,
that have made the city what it is.
It is less about the iconic than about the fabric, the pavements on which
we walk, the blend of old and new, of how the city speaks to us through
the parks, streets and alleys, of how the ground and the buildings rising
from it become the set against which we can live our lives as best we
can, and as we can only in London.